Discussions

No thats not the problem. Your problem is with the constructors. You've got TriggerManager(Trigger Recall, Trigger Control, Trigger... Activated) and TriggerManager(Trigger Recall,Trigger... Activated) Now if you write: new TriggerManager(Trig1, Trig2, Trig3, Trig4) this would fit in both constructors. In the first case you would have Trig1 in Recall ,Trig2 in Control and Trig3 and Trig4 in Activated... In the second case you would have Trig 1 in Recall and Trig2, Trig3 and Trig4 in Activated. So the compiler don't know, which constructor he has to take now... So you has to think a

Research an encryption algorithm, and implement it :)

Sorry, the support classes page was accidentally disabled - I have restored it now.

Thank you for your help, it works now.

I had a similar problem today. Make sure you're using setImage(image) in your code. if it's there, and in the right spot, and it still doesnt work. let us know i like to make an updateImage() method that i call first from the constructor, and then any time i change the string i start the method with img.clear() to get rid of the old string, and then finish with setImage(img)

Thank you very much, my group and I checked that and found the mistake a little while after we posted the message. We actually were able to get the loop working and the movement is working correctly now, thanks for the comment to help though.

Now, that I know how things are arranged, I can say the the pads are not neccessary. All you needed to do was add a Property instance variable in the Property class called 'nextProperty' and link all the properties with it.

it is only a name, call it an other name and it will work, too

It appears you have to0 many brackets, though you could have just copied an extra one over while posting it. Also, is the name of the class Bom or bom?

OMG thank you guys and IsVarious i visualise it and got it now my game is going to be pro and i have learned something

IsVarious: try that in a scenario and you'll see that it doesn't work :)

Now I have:

thx. I think I will use it-

no problem you are welcome :)