Discussions

What clued me in was "between 65 or 75" -- not and.

I do not know the movement of the actor(s) or what moves them. I do not know how accurate you want to be in the placement of the objects. All I know is you are trying to limit how high the actors stack and, now with your last post, I am presuming that the placed actor is to align horizontally with a Plate object (which it may or may not be touching). Maybe you can give a synopsis of what you want to happen and how -- so any answer given is an informed one.

Basic code: <Code Omitted>You will notice that it will constantly shoot when you press space. To avoid that, you need a timer.

Your condition could be that either the key or the mouse is pressed. Note that pressing the mouse is a little bit different. There is no "isMouseKeyDown" method. You can only check when the mouse changes from one state to another. So when it is pressed and when it is released. But you could check if a mouse press is detected on the button and then check the location of the mouse (if it is still over the button) and if the button was released. If one of that happened, "isMouseKeyDown" would be false.

Alright thanks, that worked.

What do you have so far for the game over and loose class codes?

I just threw this together. Not tested or anything. Hope it works and/or helps.

That worked. Thanks for your help!

<Code Omitted>The above is not tested -- but, I believe it should work. Be advised that the elements are typed as Actor objects and, as such, the methods or fields that are declared in either of the two classes are not accessible without first casting any of the objects appropriately as the type they actually are (as a läufer or läufer2 type object; you can use the 'instanceof' conditional to check which class the object belongs to).

Thank you! Such an obvious mistake and I missed it!

I do not see anything that would seriously cause any lagging. The suggestion Hippo gave to show the constructors of other classes might help. However, showing entire class codes would be more helpful so as to leave no stone left unturned (if you know what I mean).

<Code Omitted>

It works, thank you very much :)

this code : <Code Omitted>will be replaced by :