I don't believe that having the history between the applet and the comments is attractive. I'm not sure that the history adds anything, and if it does, I recommend that it be moved to the very bottom. Dick Baldwin (dbal)

I agree that it shouldn't be the way it is now. We are in the process of redesigning the entire site and I will make sure this goes into the discussion. Thanks for feedback! Poul Henriksen

Tried to run this as a 450x450 world, but that is apparently too large to run online because it is not all visible. Note, however, that it is all visible when exported and run as a local applet. Will cut back the overall size and see what happens. It looks like the online size limit is about 405 wide by 225 high.

Seems to fit and run OK for a world size equal to 400 pixels wide and 240 pixels high with a one-pixel cell size. However, this is much smaller overall than the Wave scenario. The difference may be that the cell size may be larger in the Wave scenario. Maybe the upper limit on size is based on the number of cells and not the actual number of pixels - just a guess on my part.

I just tried testing this with a few other scenarios, and the problem is that the size of the applet is not updated after the first time the scenario is submitted. I have added the it to our bug tracking system.

That means that for now, the size of a scenario submitted to the Gallery cannot be changed. A work-around is to change the title - this will create a new scenario. However, the "I like it" votes and the comment history would be lost. We'll see that we fix this for the next release.

Yes, the problem with changing the size of the scenario after the first upload is fixed. Thanks, Dick Baldwin Free online programming tutorials: http://www.dickbaldwin.com/toc.htm